Connect with us

News

Clarence Thomas Savages Justices, Feckless John Roberts for Refusing PA Election Cases

Spread the word

Justice Clarence Thomas has issued a scathing dissent to the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision to decline to hear the merits of lawsuits challenging the 2020 election in Pennsylvania and by so doing, detailed what he described as the “inexplicable” avoidance of cases with critical implications for future elections.

Yet again, Justice Thomas had the backs of millions of American conservatives as Chief Justice John Roberts inexplicably failed to act on a critical constitutional issue.

On Monday, the high court declined to take up the election challenge cases, offering no public explanation, while Thomas and Justices Samuel Alito and Neil Gorsuch issued dissents.

Politico noted that only four justices are needed to review a case, but it is speculated the cases were simply considered moot because Joe Biden was formally certified as the winner of the election and has now been sworn into office.

The Trump campaign, the Pennsylvania Republican Party, and others were alleging that Keystone State officials made unconstitutional changes to mail-in voting rules to the effect of influencing the outcome of the state’s presidential election, an issue which came before the SCOTUS prior to the election.

In October, the court had deadlocked 4-4 on a request from the Trump/GOP camp for a stay that would have blocked a 3-day extension on the deadline for Pennsylvania’s polling centers to receive mail-in ballots.

“The Pennsylvania Legislature established an unambiguous deadline for receiving mail-in ballots: 8 p.m. on election day. Dissatisfied, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court extended that deadline by three days,’ Justice Thomas wrote in his dissent.

He noted the state Supreme Court had “also ordered officials to count ballots received by the new deadline even if there was no evidence — such as a postmark — that the ballots were mailed by election day.”

Thomas seemed to accept that both the cases are now indeed moot and that the vote totals impacted by the actions of Pennsylvania officials do not seem to have managed to give Joe Biden the state. But he clearly outlined the big, fat elephant in the room: the implication of these actions on future elections.

“That decision to rewrite the rules seems to have affected too few ballots to change the outcome of any federal election. But that may not be the case in the future,” he wrote. “These cases provide us with an ideal opportunity to address just what authority nonlegislative officials have to set election rules, and to do so well before the next election cycle.”

“The refusal to do so is inexplicable,” he added, in what can only be interpreted as a firm rebuke of his fellow justices, particularly the ever inept Chief Justice Roberts.

Regardless of whether the election was influenced deliberately by sinister forces intent on installing Joe Biden in the White House or he really, truly, honest-to-goodness is the most popular president in U.S. history, the whole function of the Supreme Court is to consider the constitutionality of a prior ruling and to only view the case within that narrow frame.


This item sells for $39.95 on Amazon. Today's special promotion is offering a massive discount on this item. President Trump 2020 Coin (Gold & Silver Plated) - Claim 1 Free OR Claim a Discount + Free Shipping This coin is a symbol of President Trump's victory and success. Get Coin HERE Or Click on the image below.

Justice Thomas noted that the issue of defining clear rules for how elections are conducted is an issue at the core of how our nation is meant to practice self-rule.

He wrote that elections “are ‘of the most fundamental significance under our constitutional structure.’ Through them, we exercise self-government. But elections enable self-governance only when they include processes that ‘giv[e] citizens (including the losing candidates and their supporters) confidence in the fairness of the election.’”

“Unclear rules threaten to undermine this system,” he continued. “They sow confusion and ultimately dampen confidence in the integrity and fairness of elections. To prevent confusion, we have thus repeatedly — although not as consistently as we should — blocked rule changes made by courts close to an election.”

“An election system lacks clear rules when, as here, different officials dispute who has authority to set or change those rules. This kind of dispute brews confusion because voters may not know which rules to follow. Even worse, with more than one system of rules in place, competing candidates might each declare victory under different sets of rules.”

This is, of course, the crux of the whole matter and underscores further how baffling it is that the justices — who are supposedly dominated by conservative, originalist judges — declined to hear a case with a narrow and significant focus on a genuinely concerning constitutional issue as relates to future elections.

“One wonders what this Court waits for,” Thomas wrote in scathing conclusion. “We failed to settle this dispute before the election, and thus provide clear rules. Now we again fail to provide clear rules for future elections. The decision to leave election law hidden beneath a shroud of doubt is baffling. By doing nothing, we invite further confusion and erosion of voter confidence. Our fellow citizens deserve better and expect more of us. I respectfully dissent.”

What is Chief Justice John Roberts doing and why doesn’t Thomas have his seat? This is a question countless conservatives are asking in the wake of this inexplicable decision.

After all, he “is the only one with the guts and the intellect to lead this feckless waste of a court out of its doldrums,” as Kyle Becker noted.

Were he appointed chief justice, Thomas would make history, of course, as first black chief justice of the Supreme Court. He would be an inspiration to millions, as he already is, as someone who has lived the classic American story of hard work and achievement against incredible odds.

Of course, much to the chagrin of those who couldn’t bear it if Thomas were to break this barrier, he would also make history as one of the most legendary stalwart conservative chief justices, as he has certainly already set himself apart as an associate justice on this count throughout the course of his career.

Because let’s be real: what good is an originalist, conservative majority on the court if it still declines to take up cases for which a keen originalist conservative eye is needed?

Elections

Alyssa Milano To Run for Congress in 2024

Spread the word

Interesting news comes from Hollywood, the place of the new liberal wave of celebrities involved in political activism. As the latest reports read, the popular Hollywood actress and member of the Democrat Party, Alyssa Milano, is considering running for a mandate in Congress.

The actress is bidding for her own place in the House of Representatives and she is a die-hard Joe Biden supporter. According to reports, her statement reads:

“I’m looking at California’s 4th District to potentially run against [Rep. Tom] McClintock (R).”

This is Milano’s response to McClintock’s victory in the reelection in 2020 by winning 56% of the votes against his Democrat counterpart.

“It’s going to take someone with, I think, name recognition and deep pockets to be able to run against McClintock, and so I’m considering it. I’m basically gathering information right now, speaking to different consultants, speaking to the community,” Milano continued.

“I would love to maybe consider flipping that seat blue.”

The Hollywood actress made it clear who is she standing with on the American political scene and, lately, she is very active on mainstream social media platforms such as Twitter.

Her comments are often discriminating and absurd, which is welcomed with criticism by the Republican voters.

In another tween she directly presents her views on the American law enforcement, with quite a radical theory:

Every attempt to blame the government for white supremacism is unacceptable to many, especially when knowing that the USA was led by a black POTUS for 2 mandates, not to mention that in the public administration as well as the private sector, people of all races and religions are treated equally.

Her political career is still unclear, but the new Democrat leadership is in close communication and cooperation with many popular celebrities from the mainstream media and Hollywood. This is one of their projects to secure more votes from the general population, especially from the youngest generations of voters.

However, it is still unclear if these “tactics” are going to work. A large majority of the population is showing clear disappointment in the duo Harris-Biden. Also, the Hollywood elites are not able to enjoy the same level of respect and admiration as they were in the past. The cultural shock of the tendentious and populistic involvement of artists of any kind in political propaganda by the government is common for socialist regimes. Everybody has the right and the chance to be politically active and share their opinion in public, but it is clear to many what is actually going on behind the closed curtains of Hollywood.

Continue Reading

COVID

If Sunlight Continues, Expect More of This – Alameda County, CA, Significantly Lowers COVID Death Toll After Review of Records

Spread the word

The COVID-19 pandemic was a true challenge for humanity. Every state and institution was affected by the new lifestyle and restrictions, let alone the normal way of living and functioning. However, the transparent media must report about the malversations and manipulations regarding many COVID-19 cases and the sole nature of the virus.

Another proof of this highly corrupted and undescribable “habit” of many public health institutions comes from the Alameda Country, California. In this county, after a review of “cause of death” records and certificates, it is concluded that the actual death toll caused by COVID is lower by 25%.

This leads the public to believe that the speculations of manipulated COVID fatality records are actually true. In fact, this is not an isolated case only in the USA. Manipulation of COVID fatality records is noted all over the world, in some under-developed countries even to a much higher extent.

However, it is shocking and unacceptable for the USA to apply such low standards. On the other hand, this is an extremely sensitive issue for those who have deceased ones during the COVID pandemic.

“There are definitely people who died from reasons that were clearly not caused by COVID,”

said Neetu Balram, a spokesperson for the Alameda County Public Health Department.


This item sells for $39.95 on Amazon. Today's special promotion is offering a massive discount on this item. President Trump 2020 Coin (Gold & Silver Plated) - Claim 1 Free OR Claim a Discount + Free Shipping This coin is a symbol of President Trump's victory and success. Get Coin HERE Or Click on the image below.

Balram couldn’t give specifics about the true cause of death for the 411 people removed from the COVID-19 data, but she said the cases were identified after reviewing codes entered by county coroners into CalREDIE, the state’s database for disease reporting and surveillance. Alameda County uses CalREDIE data to populate its COVID dashboard.

As the report reads, the best “trick” to raise the COVID death toll is not to differ between dying WITH COVID and dying FROM COVID. In most of the objected cases, COVID is not the factual reason for death.

It is once again very symptomatic to see how Donald Trump was actually right when he opened this topic. Back then, he faced fierce attacks against him by the Democrats, the media, and many different “experts” who are in favor of the left.

The spread of the COVID-19 pandemic was mostly due to bad communication between the countries and poor decision-making by the World Health Organization. At the same time, politicians such as Donald Trump were oppressed and directly opposed by the media and the left only because they were suspicious and full of criticism about the way we’re dealing with the virus.

Continue Reading

News

BREAKING: Justice Dept. Pushes ‘Red Flag’ Laws, Takes Aim at Firearm Accessories To ‘Reduce Gun Violence’

Spread the word

Today, it was announced in an official statement that the Department of Justice will take two new direct approaches towards dealing with the rising gun violence in many communities.

The first step in the program is to follow the proposed rulemaking by the DOJ that makes clear that when individuals use accessories to convert pistols into short-barreled rifles, they will have to deal with much more regulations. Besides establishing new standards and heightened regulations, the second step is the model legislation that is supposed to help states create their original “extreme risk protection order” legislation.

This proposed rule has been sent to the Federal Register and the model legislation will soon be reviewed because the deadlines issued by the Attorney General and Biden administration are met.

“The Justice Department is determined to take concrete steps to reduce the tragic toll of gun violence in our communities,” said Attorney General Merrick B. Garland. “Today we continue to deliver on our promise to help save lives while protecting the rights of law-abiding Americans. We welcome the opportunity to work with communities in the weeks and months ahead in our shared commitment to end gun violence.”

The proposed rulemaking issued by the DOJ is supposed to enforce restrictions on short-barreled rifles and, even more critically, put the pistols that are equipped with specific accessories in the same group of weapons.


This item sells for $39.95 on Amazon. Today's special promotion is offering a massive discount on this item. President Trump 2020 Coin (Gold & Silver Plated) - Claim 1 Free OR Claim a Discount + Free Shipping This coin is a symbol of President Trump's victory and success. Get Coin HERE Or Click on the image below.

This practice is also called “red flag laws” and they are unnatural and incompatible with the US Constitution. On the other hand, this new legislation will enable certain anti-gun states to take a step further and push even stronger regulations on pistols and other small caliber weapons. Conservative Americans who strongly support the 2nd Amendment alongside millions of weapon owners might protest against this proposal.

Also, experts want to show the importance of the understanding of the “red flag laws”. If the Democratic party continues to push harder over different/multiple legislations to neutralize the 2nd Amendment of the Constitution, it might lead to severe damage in the connection between the federal government (as central) and state governments (as local).

The reactions over this by the two largest political establishments in the country are yet to be seen. However, it seems that the GOP and the Democratic Party will have a lot to discuss on this matter. Meanwhile, the public has 90 days left to submit comments. It is expected to see public debates and the people themselves will have the opportunity to discuss the pros and cons of this project. This anti-gun campaign is supported by the liberal voters in, mostly, the “Blue States”. However, the rest of the country might be divided because of the revolt of those who are against this model legislation.

To read the model legislation click here.

More about the rulemaking here.

Continue Reading

Trending